Rental investors warned to consider more than just price and yield

Rental investors warned to consider more than just price and yield


Todays other news
JLL cuts its UK house price forecast for 2026 but...
Homesearch says AI-driven property search is transforming buyer behaviour and...
Flexible booking options can help holiday let owners increase revenue...
Ellisons appoints senior associate Sarah Osborne to strengthen leasehold enfranchisement...

Property investors purchasing new rental properties should carry out more detailed pre‑purchase checks to better protect themselves once the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force on 1 May.

Online platform Intelligent Home Information (IHI)says the reforms within the act place renewed importance on understanding potential risks associated with a property before committing to buy.

The new legislation will radically alter the private rented homes sector. It includes the abolition of ‘no‑fault’ evictions, a move to rolling tenancies, tighter rent controls and greater leniency on allowing pets. But for property investors it could mean far less flexibility to resolve problems that emerge after a property has been purchased.

Changing the balance of risk

Jane Foster, spokesperson for Intelligent Home Information, said: “The Renters’ Rights Act changes the balance of risk for landlords. If you’re buying a property to rent, it’s no longer enough to simply look only at price and yield.

“Landlords need clarity around long‑term suitability, compliance and potential restrictions before they purchase, because once a tenant is in place, resolving problems or exiting an investment may not be straightforward.”

Instead, she said that those investing in rental properties should consider everything from insights into a property’s planning history, flood and environmental risk, infrastructure schemes and local authority data to help identify issues that may affect rental use or future resale.  

“House hunters, including landlords, deserve clarity and confidence before making one of life’s biggest financial decisions,” said Foster. To help, Intelligent Home Information is offering its Instant Risk Screening Reports, which normally cost £10, for free. These provide a clear summary of potential risks, alongside practical guidance on next steps.

If issues are flagged, investors can either walk away or choose to purchase more detailed, in‑depth reports, the company says, all of which can be shared with solicitors if they decide to proceed.

The free risk report is available here: Instant Property Risk Screening | Intelligent Home Information

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Property Investor Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Subscribe to comments
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Ellisons appoints senior associate Sarah Osborne to strengthen leasehold enfranchisement...
House prices have continued to show resilience in the face...
While eight in ten (84%) landlords report that their lettings...
Why understanding deal structure matters more than starting capital in...
No, London was not the best performing area...
London appears to be the worst affected location...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
JLL cuts its UK house price forecast for 2026 but...
Homesearch says AI-driven property search is transforming buyer behaviour and...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x