Stagnating London rents mean investors rely on capital appreciation

Stagnating London rents mean investors rely on capital appreciation


Todays other news
Transactions are down on a year earlier and values continuing...
Enness Global analysed Google search trend data across the UK...
Set on a 3.13 acre site, the former food manufacturing...
Two reports paint a pessimistic analysis of the Prime Central...

The latest research from a lettings agency shows that in real terms London rents have stagnated over the past 10 years.

Benham and Reeves says that on paper the average rent in London has climbed by 39.2% over the past decade, but when adjusting for inflation, the real-terms increase is just 0.7%.

It says this confounds the popular myth that rent rises are down to landlord greed, but are in fact the impact of wider economic pressures.

The research analysed average monthly rental values across all 32 London boroughs between May 2015 and May 2025, comparing nominal increases to those adjusted in line with inflation as measured by the Consumer Prices Index (CPI).

It found that while the average London rent has increased from £1,616 in May 2015 to £2,249 today – a jump of £633 or 39.2% – the inflation-adjusted change equates to just £15 more per month in real terms, marking a 0.7% rise.

Looking across the capital, some boroughs have seen far stronger rental growth than others. The biggest real-terms increases have been seen in:

• Barking and Dagenham, where rents are up 16.5% after inflation (£229 per month higher in real terms)

• Havering (16.3% or £211)


• Bexley (14.3% or £182)
 

• Redbridge (12.0% or £180)
 

• Waltham Forest (7.4% or £120)

In contrast, many traditionally more expensive boroughs have actually seen rental values fall when adjusted for inflation. These include:

• Westminster, where rents are down -4.9% in real terms (a £168 monthly decline)

• Richmond upon Thames (-3.9%)
 

• Camden (-3.1%)
 

• Kingston upon Thames (-2.8%)
 

• Kensington and Chelsea (-2.3%)

In total, 12 of the 32 boroughs saw real-terms rental declines, suggesting that higher nominal rents are more a reflection of inflationary pressure than profiteering.

Marc von Grundherr, director of Benham and Reeves, comments: “There’s a widespread perception that landlords are to blame for the sharp rise in rents, particularly in London, but the data tells a very different story. Once inflation is taken into account, rental growth over the last 10 years has been largely stagnant and,  in many areas, rents have actually fallen in real terms.

“This underlines the real issue in the rental sector: a severe mismatch between supply and demand. Landlords face higher mortgage costs, tighter regulations, and increasing taxation, yet many are not passing those costs on at the rate people assume. If anything, this data highlights the need to support landlords, not vilify them, if we want a functioning private rental sector.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Property Investor Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Transactions are down on a year earlier and values continuing...
Set on a 3.13 acre site, the former food manufacturing...
Two reports paint a pessimistic analysis of the Prime Central...
Professional landlords in the prime market are better placed than...
Anthony Joshua, has secured Oman’s most expensive luxury penthouse....
Zoopla expects average UK house prices to increase by 1.5...
Income tax for landlords will rise by 2% across the...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Transactions are down on a year earlier and values continuing...
Set on a 3.13 acre site, the former food manufacturing...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.